COST AND TIME ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE WORKS USING CONVENTIONAL RIVERSTONE METHOD AND PRECAST U-DITCH METHOD

Authors

  • Yulianus Brechmans Dilianto Sarjanawiata Tamansiswa University Author
  • Dimas Langga Chandra Galuh Faculty of Engineering Sarjanawiata Tamansiswa University, Yogyakarta Author
  • Widarto Sutrisno Faculty of Engineering Sarjanawiata Tamansiswa University, Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33603/jgst.v8i1.135

Keywords:

cost comparison, time, drainage

Abstract

Road drainage is part of the infrastructure required for roads. This infrastructure is designed to drain water from the surface of the road to its final disposal. In general terms, drainage is a series of structures designed to reduce and remove excess water from an area or land to allow the land to function optimally. There are two types of road drainage systems, surface and subsurface. Surface drainage systems are generally open or closed channels.

The method used in this research is quantitative method, where this method explains a process of seeking knowledge using data in the form of numbers as a means of analysing information about the things is desired to know about a situation that becomes the object of study and then analysed with the help of Microsoft Excel 2013 and Microsoft Word 2013 software.

The comparative analysis results of the cost and time for implementation of drainage works using the conventional river stone method over a length of 192 metres requires 55 working days at a cost of Rp 123,617,000.0, while the precast U-ditch method over a length of 174 metres requires 48 working days at a cost of Rp 78,292,000.0. Where the implementation of the conventional method turns out to be 14% longer than using the precast method.

The results of the analysis of the cost per metre of drainage works using the conventional river stone method and the precast u-ditch method obtained the results, which are drainage works using the conventional river stone method amounting to Rp 6,438,385 while the work using the precast u-ditch method is Rp 4,449,540, with the difference between the two methods amounting to Rp 1,988,845. Where the use of the precast method is 30% lower than the conventional method.

References

A. G. R. Andika, 2022, “Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Pembangunan Saluran Drainase Menggunakan Metode Konvensional (Batu Kali) Dengan (U-Ditch) Studi kasus proyek pembangunan saluran drainase di ruas jalan Bypass Dharmagiri Gianyar”, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset Dan Teknologi Politeknik Negeri Bali Jurusan Teknik Sipil Program Studi D III.

F. Zulkarnain, dan I. Dewi, 2020, “PKM Pembuatan Saluran Drainase Dusun Ii Jln Inpres Desa Tanjung Gusta Untuk Mengatasi Banjir”, Teknik Sipil Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Vol 5, No. 1, Desember.

G. R. F. G. Wahidin, dan M. Taufiq, 2020, “Perencanaan Pembangunan Drainase di Desa Ciawi Kecamatan Banjarharjo Kabupaten Brebes,” Infratech Build. J., 52–60.

I. K. E. Wirawan, I. N. A. P. Winaya, ST. Msi., dan Y. Sukarmawati, ST. MT., 2022, “Perbandingan Produktivitas Beton Cetak U-Dicth Dengan Bius Beton”, Pengajuan Repository pada September.

Ir. R. D. H. Yusuf, ST. MSc., dan M. W. Ramadhan, 2022, “Analisis Efisiensi Biaya dan Waktu Pekerjaan Drainase Menggunakan Metode Konvensional Dengan Metode Pracetak Studi Kasus Pekerjaan Drainase Kel. Indonesiana Kota Tidore Kepulauan”, Dintek, Vol. 15, No. 1, Maret, 1-11.

J. Abda, 2021, “Tinjauan Sistem Drainase Jalan”, Orbith, Vol. 17, No. 2, 107-113.

M. L. Gustomi, M. Taufiq, A. Khamid, Imron, dan Wahidin, 2023, “Perbandingan Waktu dan Biaya Pelaksanaan Drainase Konvensional Pasangan Batu Kali dengan Beton Pracetak U-Ditch (Studi Kasus di Desa Karanganyar Kecamatan Pagerbarang Kabupaten Tegal)”, Era Sains: Journal of Science, Engineering and Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, Mei, 56-65.

R. Cainawa, “Perbandingan Metode Pelaksanaan Beton Konvensional Dengan Pra Cetak Terhadap Biaya dan Waktu (Studi Kasus: Pekerjaan Drainase Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Tol Balikpapan-Samarinda Seksi 4)”, Fakultas Teknik Unirvesitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda.

Ruspiansyah, dan A. Maryanto, 2021, “Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Pekerjaan Drainase Antara Metode Precast Dan Cast In Situ”, Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil, Vol. 5, No. 1, Juni, 28-39.

S. A. A. A. Satria, Kustamar, dan L. K. Wulandari, 2021,“Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Saluran Drainase Batu Kali Dengan Beton Readymix Dan Beton Pracetak Pada Ruas Jalan Boyolangu - Campurdarat Kabupaten Tulungagung”, of Civil Engineering Department, National Institut of Technology, Malang.

Y. W. Januardi, 2023, “Studi Perbandingan Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Beton Fc 20 Pada Proyek Jalan Antara Metode SNI dan Lapangan”, Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sarjanawiata Tamansiswa.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

COST AND TIME ANALYSIS OF DRAINAGE WORKS USING CONVENTIONAL RIVERSTONE METHOD AND PRECAST U-DITCH METHOD. (2024). Journal of Green Science and Technology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/jgst.v8i1.135